If he ever responds to my e-mail, I will send him that, also. The latest E-mail from the stables of BigJim:
EMAIL 5: Subject: Living in the REAL world...
On your website, you say:
"Living in the REAL world, not a fantasy one."
Who do you mean by that? Us, the NUTTERS? Certainly it can't be you. You have not examined any of the facts, but simply made up "facts" that support your theory. (i.e. a "radiation oven" for making moon rocks, making up statistics that supposedly support you, quoting theories and opinions as facts). You continually refuse to respond to any attempts to communicate or debate with people who support Apollo and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. By only posting the e-mails which agree with you, and totally disregarding everything else, is to be living in a FANTASY world, not a real one.
I challenge you once more to attempt to rebut, on your website or in an e-mail, the points I have raised. I will not even go into the panopoly of books and websites on Apollo which I have informed you of in previous e-mails. Why do you want to ignore facts and the truth? Why do you put your e-mail address on your website if you don't want to get any e-mails except those that agree with you? In fact, I would not be surprised if you get more pro-NASA e-mails than ant-NASA ones; by only posting those who agree with you, you contrive the truth so it suits your purposes. Do you really think that you are presenting a fair and accurate view of Apollo? Why is it that you keep using the "you are a NUTTER" defense to dismiss any real science or debunking of your own claims?
I await your reply, and your attempt to rebut the evidence I have presented in my e-mails. If you truly want to live in the REAL world, not a fantasy one, then get some books on Apollo. Visit some websites, and then see what you think. (another one to visit is
http://www.clavius.org) There is so much information on Apollo which you clearly have not seen, much less successfully debunked, that your website, despite all the time you spend on it, does little to go against Apollo. Or, at least, after viewing and considering the evidence fairly, if you still disagree, try to scientifically and rationally describe why instead of just saying because we are all NUTTERS.
I wonder if I should keep sending him e-mail in the hopes I will pester him into a response, or just stop, or maybe just keep sending him the same ones, since I doubt he has read them anyway. I have sent an awful lot already (especially in #2).