Well, I haven't detected any trojan horse myself, but that doesn't sound good. I'm sure the website service has appropriate security to protect against that sort of thing. It does favor pop-up ads, however.

I don't know what else I can tell you at this point, unless you have some specific questions about any of it. Most everything I have come up with so far is either on the website or in this forum. I'm not an expert, however, but more of an independent researcher and theorist, as it seems you are as well. I am still just trying to put it all together, piece by piece.

I guess neutrino pressure probably would serve the same fuction as a vacuum energy density. It sounds like the same definition. I believe all particles and mass may be made up of the energy of neutrinos and/or light and move through the neutrino medium as waves. Their large energies allows them to be seen as particles. This is similar to string theory, since the energy of the waves is simply turned in upon itself, "trapped" if you will. This might be viewed as extra dimensions. The neutrinos themselves (or neutrino-like particles) that make up the vacuum are therefore just curled-up dimensions at the planck length. This doesn't mean I believe in extra dimensions, however. On the contrary. But I am trying to figure out how all of the different fields of physics can be related.

Quantum physics, for example, is said to be inconsistent with relativity. But QM is the physics of the motions of the individual neutrinos that make up free space. In other words, it applies as one approaches the Planck length, about the size of an individual neutrino. Relativity, however, applies to very large regions of space, where the random motions of neutrinos cancel out, and space appears very smooth.

I could probably go on, but I'd just be repeating much of which I have already stated before. If there is anything in particular you would like to discuss in detail, please let me know.

__________________
Let's put together the pieces of The Grand Puzzle . (website)

"Let's define another operator, Sz, which we won't pay any attention to."
"This transformation will automatically make zero equal zero."
"It may be true that zero equals zero -- and that is certainly an equality -- but I don't want to go into the details at this time."