Quote:
Originally Posted by Bogie
What are you getting at?
Space either contains matter/energy or vacuum energy, and the relationship between the two defines the value of the cosmological constant.
|
There is a third factor here according to current thinking...DM.
So space is made up of DM and DE and the baryonic matter/energy 'warps' that DM/DE field.
There are many theories that are trying to define the 'smallest basic quantum size' for how all subatomic particles get their mass/gravity.
Besides String/"M" theory, there is of course Higgs boson/field and several well known others, including somehow incorperating neutinos into the picture.
Here are a few others that might be of interest.
Borehole:
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/physics/pdf/0512/0512109.pdf
flat orbital:
http://www.mountainman.com.au/process_physics/HPS28.pdf
And
http://www.inerton.kiev.ua/links.htm
The reality, IMHO, is realizing that (as in the Cahill papers), that 'all' of space is made up of the "EEP' as in Bogies paradygm, and so therefore DM/DE is all one gravitational field that does not interact with baryonic matter.
Except when that 'background' gravitational field is 'influenced'.
Now, since baryonic matter does not influence/interact with that 'background' field, what is the only thing that can influence it???
Also, Bogie, are you aware of the Fine Structure Constant a= ~1/137, and have you done any comparisons of your EEP to it? IE, size differnces, energy differences etc.?