View Single Post
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 14-August-2006, 11:36 PM
Bogie's Avatar
Bogie Bogie is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,340
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RussT View Post
There is a third factor here according to current thinking...DM.

So space is made up of DM and DE and the baryonic matter/energy 'warps' that DM/DE field.

There are many theories that are trying to define the 'smallest basic quantum size' for how all subatomic particles get their mass/gravity.

Besides String/"M" theory, there is of course Higgs boson/field and several well known others, including somehow incorperating neutinos into the picture.

Here are a few others that might be of interest.

Borehole: http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/physics/pdf/0512/0512109.pdf

flat orbital: http://www.mountainman.com.au/process_physics/HPS28.pdf

And

http://www.inerton.kiev.ua/links.htm

The reality, IMHO, is realizing that (as in the Cahill papers), that 'all' of space is made up of the "EEP' as in Bogies paradygm, and so therefore DM/DE is all one gravitational field that does not interact with baryonic matter.

Except when that 'background' gravitational field is 'influenced'.

Now, since baryonic matter does not influence/interact with that 'background' field, what is the only thing that can influence it???

Also, Bogie, are you aware of the Fine Structure Constant a= ~1/137, and have you done any comparisons of your EEP to it? IE, size differnces, energy differences etc.?
I chuckle a little sadly when I think about the difference between imaginative speculation (what I do), and real science.

Quote:
Now, since baryonic matter does not influence/interact with that 'background' field, what is the only thing that can influence it???
Tell me and explain.