Nereid, thank you for your questions. I recognize that as a moderator you have some responsibility to offer some perspective as a bridge between the mainstream and “against the mainstream”. I have identified my posts as speculation, and have offered them here in order to start and participate in a message board discussion about ideas that are thought to be so far out that credentialed scientists would not have any interest in participating, accept maybe to point out the uselessness and futility of such discussions.
To elaborate on my ideas is one thing. To tie them back to real science is not possible. That is the point of calling them “against the mainstream” speculations, am I right?
I’ll answer your questions from the perspective of discussing speculative, un-provable, non-science. Don’t expect my answers to make sense in the world of reality. If you have a preconceived position that they need to be refuted and dispelled, don’t bother; no one with any sense will be deceived or mislead by my imaginative speculation, I’m sure.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nereid
What would you say are the three top "problems of particle physics" that your idea solves?
|
In all due respect, the OP spelled out my view as follows:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bogie
This is a work-in-progress and I could use some constructive input form those of you who have been particle curious for long enough to have proposed characteristics of a basic particle and a unifying force.
Background: Particle physicists are at work back engineering the structure of matter. From their work they theorize the existence of certain particles and reactions, and as they push back the veil, they either confirm or deny the predictions.
Observation: Back engineering of particles and theoretical physics is likely to lead to the eventual discovery of a unifying force and an elemental particle from which everything else is constructed. I will refer to this future discovery as the Elemental Energy Wave/Particle (EEw/P or EEP for short).
Part of the reason that there is disagreement about the nature of black holes (or are they gravastars) is because we don’t yet fully understand particles and forces. My theory of how ultimate black holes solve the problem of increasing entropy in the greater universe predicts an elemental energy wave/particle (EEP).
Such a wave/particle will have to be simple and have characteristics that allow it to build the quantum particles and to carry out physics as we know it today. Here is a proposal for such a particle.
|
I know that doesn’t exactly address the top three specific problems of particle physics, but I explains where I was coming from on my thread.
Quote:
|
Other than because it exists in your own (speculative) idea, what is it about the universe that requires a "sub-quantum environment"?
|
I have perceived from my reading of various websites and forum threads that quantum mechanics and general relativity are not unified. There is a search for a unifying particle, and I have tried to imagine what such a particle would be like.
One obvious and understandable posture in science is that those who are best informed about research are not interested in lay ideas because if there was a good idea, some educated and credentialed scientist would think of it, and it would be a waste of time to weed through all the hair-brained ideas from fringe characters.
Quote:
|
I think I missed this part - how does your idea produce something that looks like Newtonian gravity (inverse square law force, G, infinite speed, etc) or GR (bending of light, frame dragging, gravitational radiation, propogates at c, etc), in the appropriate limits?
|
If you understand the EEP as I have described it, you know that I speculate that it has infinitesimal mass and is extremely dense. I describe it as a particle, but it really pulses as it moves at the speed of light, a wave/particle. The pulsing is a characterization of its perpetual energy that is indestructible. It has always existed, has always been in motion, and can interact with like “particles” but never loses its individual identity. Combinations of EEPs resulting from these interactions are the basis of the “particle like” structures that are the building blocks of nucleosynthesis. Gravity (relativistic warping of space) exists below the framework of Newtonian physics, and is expressed by the EEPs that are the building blocks that make up Newtonian level particles. Protons for example produce gravity as a result of the particular combinations of EEP structure within them.
REAL early. In fact, I speculate that the big bang was preceded by a big crunch. The big bang resulted from a big crunch. The characteristic of “ultimate” black holes that become big bangs is dependant on the nature of EEPs. Inside the ultimate black hole, pressure becomes near infinite, and locks the EEPs so tightly at the very core of the UBH that they can’t pulse. There is great energy being repressed by the locking. There is a unique environment within the black whole where highly excited EEPs "negate" the matter that is accumulated and EEPs are released from the matter that is captured by the black hole. As EEPs are released from the accumulated matter, the active EEPs at the edge of the core come under increasing pressure and eventually join the locked core. This process goes on and on until the locked core has expanded in size to a point that the compression of the black hole's own gravity can no longer contain the repressed energy of the locked EEPs, and a big bang occurs.
Quote:
|
What is a "quantum particle"?
|
I concede that the definition you are asking me to give is an example of the disconnect between mainstream and “against the mainstream” threads. If it is a serious question, google it.
Quote:
|
What are some examples of "the formation and destruction of [...] atomic particles"?
|
My speculation, as mentioned above, is that atomic particles are composed of EEPs (wave/particles that are released from ultimate black holes by big bangs) in various combinations that serve as building blocks of atomic particles. Atomic particles are drawn into ultimate black holes where they are destroyed right down to the EEPs that they are composed of.
This is a never ending process in a greater universe that has always existed, is infinite, is filled infinitely with matter and energy, and where big crunches and big bangs occur here and there, now and then, fueled by the very nature of the unifying elemental energy wave/particles that premeate space.
I call it the Infinite Spongy Universe (ISU).