Quote:
|
Originally Posted by sts60
Your question raises another one, though: given the evidence that already exists for Apollo, why should images taken by another spacecraft convince anyone? Any such image will be entirely electronic once it crosses the lens and hits the imaging array. What would stop NASA or whoever took such images from simply creating them in a computer? Why would they be convincing?
|
I'm sure that, when we eventually have regularly scheduled flights to the Moon, the few remaining HBs et al, will claim it's all being done on a holodeck. Or maybe even a futuristic animation...
Welcome to the BAUT, softearth. Have fun!
__________________
A person's name, or a mark representing it, as signed personally or by deputy, as in subscribing a letter or other document.
|