View Single Post
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 20-August-2006, 07:45 AM
Maksutov's Avatar
Maksutov Maksutov is offline
Honored Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Fifth corner of the Earth
Posts: 16,731
Default Re: Moon Hoax - A Simple Solution

Quote:
Originally Posted by softearth View Post
It seems that after doing some research on the subject of going back to the moon, NASA isn't the only one interested. I found a few resources for reference.

Ref: http://www.transorbital.net/media.html

Ref: http://www.space.com/businesstechnol...al_030715.html

The funny thing about this link is that it says:

A test mission was launched into Earth orbit in December 2002 to check out TrailBlazer's launch vehicle, a Dnepr rocket, and the spacecraft separation process.

"That launch performed flawlessly," said Laurie. "Our second step is to go to the Moon." TrailBlazer's launch is set for early 2004.

WHY DIDN'T WE HEAR ANYTHING ABOUT THIS?
Those of us who regularly read www.space.com heard about it when it happened. It's interesting to note that the TransOrbital website (http://www.transorbital.net/bluespar...p?action=index) hasn't been updated since 2004.

BTW, why are you shouting?

Quote:
Originally Posted by softearth View Post
Ref: http://www.lpi.usra.edu/expmoon/future/future.html

So it seems there is great interest in going back to the moon, not only for science, but commercial use as well.

Hope this helps explain away why cost isn't an issue.
Perhaps the reason TransOrbital has been delaying further missions for years now is due to money, or lack thereof. Same thing applies to the Russian proposals too.
__________________
A person's name, or a mark representing it, as signed personally or by deputy, as in subscribing a letter or other document.