I think an ATM section is absolutely necessary, and you'd have a difficult time convincing me otherwise.

In my experience, many ATM theorists don't entirely understand the scientific method, and have faith, not skepticism about their ideas. When scientists have a theory, it's their duty to find all the ways they're probably wrong, and then test them out, item by item. Many ATM theorists have skipped that step, and have convinced themselves that they're correct - if only they could get people to listen to them.

It's nearly impossible to change their minds. And if you deride, mock, or make light of their theories, it just fills fencesitters with doubt. Just look at how many people think that "intelligent design" should be taught with evolution as an alternative. It sounds reasonable on its face.

The only way to promote rational thought is to calmly and carefully challenge the theories, demonstrating how they're incorrect based on the evidence we have so far. The ATM theorists can be tricky and slippery, relying on many obnoxious tactics to bully people who challenge their theories.

But for every wild-eyed ATM theorist, there are dozens of spectators watching how we debunk and enlighten. And it's for their benefit that this section exists. I want it slurped up by Google, so that if someone types in "moon hoax", this forum should show up. Instead of believing some conspiracy theory, they'll get an opportunity to see it properly debunked.

So this and the CT sections are very important. And even more important is the methods we employ to debunk the theories.

And maybe, just maybe, a theory may come along that really does change our understanding of the Universe. And I hope we'll be openminded, not dismiss it out of hand, and help the theorist make connections to get theories validated.

__________________
Fraser Cain
Publisher
Universe Today - Free space news delivered by email every weekday.