View Single Post
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 30-August-2006, 11:11 PM
Attiyah Zahdeh Attiyah Zahdeh is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 188
Default

[QUOTE=Nereid;815180]Perhaps this post by Celestial Mechanic was overlooked?

Attiyah Zahdeh, would you please answer Celestial Mechanic's questions?

If I may, I will extend them somewhat.

In the Attiyah Zahdeh idea, what is the expected brightness of Venus, as seen from the surface of the Earth, as a function of time?

In the Attiyah Zahdeh idea, what is the expected brightness of the Apollo asteroids, as seen from the surface of the Earth, as a function of time?

In the Attiyah Zahdeh idea, what is the expected brightness of the Galilean moons, as seen by the Pioneer 10 and 11, Voyager 1 and 2, Galileo, and Cassini prob

-=============
Concerning the questions of Celestial Mechnic I consider that I answered them in this statement:

Attiyah's postulates are obvious.
Great thanks to the reputable Moderator Antoniseb.
However, I want to to say to the reputable members: Maksutov ,Celestial Mechanic and Van Rijn that Attiyah's Sun Theory does not deny that the Sun is a luminous body wherein nuclear fusion reactions are occurring. We must differentiate between the skylight and the direct solar light.

Accordingly, my idea does not expect any difference in the expected brightness for any celestial body as a function of time.