Point well taken, however, you know as well as I do that Nancy intends to use that poor excuse for evidence in the past as proof of a cataclysm tomorrow. That's quite evident from the page she wrote. Nancy is obviously doing her homework, Phil should be prepared for what she's going to throw at him.

But I agree, the BA should keep as "up to date" as possible, and try to keep Nancy from rambling on to unrelated past topics, as is her normal methodology. "Talk long enough about nothing, and people will forget the question they asked you". :wink: