View Single Post
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 30-September-2006, 02:46 PM
worzel's Avatar
worzel worzel is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: London
Posts: 3,114
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by StevenCrum View Post
1) This stationary synchronizing is correct, and as described in my original post.

2) The truth is that neither set of observers sees the clocks as synchronous and my original post calculations prove the fact of this.
From the paper:
We imagine further that at the two ends A and B of the rod, clocks are placed which synchronize with the clocks of the stationary system, that is to say that their indications correspond at any instant to the ``time of the stationary system'' at the places where they happen to be. These clocks are therefore ``synchronous in the stationary system.''
I.e. the clocks you refer to in 2) as being not synchronized by either the moving or stationary observer were synchronized in the way you say is correct in 1). You seem to be contradicting yourself.
__________________
There are 10 types of people in the world. Those who understand ternary, those who don't, and those waiting for a bus.
If logic doesn't work, then surely it does.