View Single Post
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 30-September-2006, 03:37 PM
worzel's Avatar
worzel worzel is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: London
Posts: 3,114
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by StevenCrum View Post
To worzel (#17)

The situation is not my contradicting myself, but that a misunderstanding exists.
But in this thread you said "The truth is that neither set of observers sees the clocks as synchronous" contradicting your position that the clocks are synchronized for the stationary system. Nevermind, I take it you mean that the clocks are only synchronized in one system (the stationary one), which is what I thought you meant in the other thread.

Quote:
First of all, you likely didn't go through the science description and calculations that I wrote in the first post of the thread about science and math proving Einstein was wrong.
I did, and I didn't see any error in Einstein's paper pointed out by you.

Quote:
A short explanation to your point here is that the synchronization method Einstein used DID work for synchronizing clocks in the stationary system. The calculations in my first post prove the way he used the method DID NOT work for the moving system.
Could you be crystal clear in answering this queston. Are you saying that Einstein's error is that he concluded that the two clocks synchronized in the stationary system are also synchronized in the moving system? Or are you saying that the synchronizaton method wouldn't work in a moving system?
__________________
There are 10 types of people in the world. Those who understand ternary, those who don't, and those waiting for a bus.
If logic doesn't work, then surely it does.