Quote:
Originally Posted by StevenCrum
To worzel (#24)
The type of thing you described about clocks fore and aft in a space ship keeps going in the endless direction of confusion that has led to people not seeing the error for 101 years.
Instead of continuing the blindness the situation requires lookking at the undeniable true facts of the math calculations and the easy-to-see method I did in the first post that shows the true math and science involved.
It is impossible to use any description like the space ship fore and aft to change the facts of the synchronization being wrong. It cannot be done, and there is no way pssible for any description to accomplish that, except for the complete situation of leaving truth and relality and going completely into fantasy. And, I don't mean to be insulting or anything like that, but the space ship and others like that are only fantasy, and they are not real science at all.
|
I am only following the logical conclusion of your assertion that Einstein's synchronization method cannot work in a moving system. You could equally use two rods moving on earth if you find the word "spaceship" unsettling. If you veto all such logical analysis of your claim then what is the point of you posting it for discussion?
__________________
There are 10 types of people in the world. Those who understand ternary, those who don't, and those waiting for a bus.
If logic doesn't work, then surely it does.
|