Quote:
Originally Posted by RussT
First, I hope you will notice that there is very little if any Big Bang bashing, anywhere in this paper.
Second, Please Bebunk what this showing, rather than asking for additional 'proof' or 'evidence'. The only way to fairly evaluate this, is to assume, that the BB didn't happen, and then see which one answers more of the comological questions we know to exist.
Third, only 2 things need to be different for this to be possible!
1. That the universe didn't begin at a point and then Inflate.
2. That the Gamma radiation that BURSTS throughout the sky at cosmological distances are NOT stars.
ALL Master Debunkers welcome!
|
"Bebunk"?
Which of these three would you like to concentrate on first?
* internal inconsistency (e.g. "it seems that, in one place you say X is green, but in another place this same X is magenta; please explain")
* inconsistency with well-established theories where the domains of applicability overlaps (e.g. "in this idea, gravity is proportional to the inverse cube of distance, even for 'solar system' type objects, yet Newtonian gravity is inverse square, in this domain; please explain")
* inconsistency with good observational or experimental results (e.g. "in this idea, the Lyman A line has a rest wavelength of 900nm; in the lab we observe it to be 121.6nm; please explain")