[quote=nomuse;852602]Glasnost.
Quote:
|
Actually, your account is a bit hard to follow. Perhaps a few links to primary sources, and less use of bold text and ALL CAPS in favor of clearer language?
|
The entire sequence of events over the years is hard to follow:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kecksburg_UFO_Incident
Quote:
|
In re your last paragraph, do you mean to say that because observers described the object as having "crash-landed," it must have been under control during the terminal phase? This does not seem obligatory to me.
|
I'm saying they noticed the craft had some form of control as it crash landed. I also think it's important to understand that in this case it's hard to claim you can trust the Airforce or NASA more than the witnesses. If there's anything we've learned in this case it's that our government can make mistakes and be flat out wrong or lie. Depends on your point of view.
Quote:
|
Furthermore, parts of spacecraft do survive re-entry -- cf. Skylab. And to go forward, in the 60's there were only two space-faring nations. Since the Air Force investigators knew it wasn't one of ours, it would be elimination be Russian.
|
With one problem - according to NASA it could not have been. I suppose my question is this - if the object was litterally unknown, would NASA, given that all they had were fragments, conclude the object was anything other than Russian? What if it was just an unknown space vehicle with no alien body?
Quote:
|
And re evidence being lost...perhaps you've heard of some missing tapes concerning Apollo 11? It does happen. People aren't perfect.
|
Well theres more to it than that. I don't understand how, after years of questions about this case, NASA suddenly comes up with this "explanation" What changed in the last few years that suddenly this explanation is available? Weather they actually lost the data or it was hidden/destroyed is for everyone to decide on their own.
However, I do find it fascinating to consider the potential implications of this case. Please read the link above (to wikipedia) for more information the case. Its kinda confusing and the deeper you go in it, the more you realize how this case has been totally contradicted and has nowhere else to go.