Originally Posted by Serenitude

Margiani, I would recommend you refrain from plugging your site again. You need to present your evidence here, in a post. You're not being terribly specific, you appear to have ignored my post. You haven't even begun to describe the process involved in your hypothesis, outside of vague generalities. You are giving the appearance of hint-dropping while trying to plug your website. I would strongly advise against that, as it is breaking forum rules.

Again - can you describe, in detail, why you think current techtonic science is in error, the details of the mechanics of your hypothesis, and why you think your explanation is simpler while satisfying all observations?