Quote:
|
some article in which some expert says they went to the moon does not constitute proof as people lie.
|
That extrapolation is no valid criterion on which to dismiss anything published, no matter what the subject is.
Especially as you include "peer reviewed, official publications of the biggest experts on the subjects, backed up by the professional community" in "some article in which some expert says".
Quote:
|
Of course there is the issue of the moon rocks but only a trained geologist with access to the right lab equipment could verify they were real. Some paper saying they're real is not proof.
|
But some paper saying they're real is written by all those trained geologists with access to the right lab equipment. That's the problem with your all encompassing paranoia towards anything published. We'd have to take you by the hand to everything done in world history, as the in between step of publication is a no go for you.