Quote:
Originally Posted by Nereid
Reviewing this thread I see that this post has not really been answered ....
RussT, it's your idea, so let's see you develop it, OK?
And please, can we have fewer "{insert your favourite mainsteam item here} can't adequately address {insert your favourite observational results here}, THEREFORE my {insert your favourite ATM idea here} must be right (or at least worthy of serious consideration)!"?
I mean, if you've got an ATM idea that you think merits developing, then go develop it. If you don't have answers to questions about such an idea, just say so.
|
Nereid, I have done exactly that...
Unifying GR & QFT
[If you don't have answers to questions about such an idea, just say so]
I have, but you seem to think that not knowing the answers or even being able to obtain the answers at this current time is Falsifying a hypothesis!
Asking questions you know I or anyone else cannot answer at the current time gets us nowwhere, but seems like a tactic you like to use for discrediting and trivializing.
Show how my hypothesis is WRONG. Debunk it. Find some internal inconsistancies, if you can.
Just asking for MORE EVIDENCE is not showing how my idea CANNOT be possible!