Quote:
Originally Posted by vorblesnak
BTB: Here is a recent article in Rolling Stone on line ..
http://www.rollingstone.com/news/sto...he_world/print
This covers the basics of the sulfur particle proposal and it's introduction. It is in the somewhat mainstream media now.
Would high sulfur coal necessarily do the same thing for us? I don't think the delivery from a smoke stack would go high enough. We got to get it up there a few miles.
David Davis
Toledo, OR 97391 |
I just don't think putting sulfur in the air is a good idea. I don't know anything about chemistry, but sulfur dioxide and hydrogen sulfide are implicated in the Permian Extinction. A pretty high price to pay for being able to drive SUVs!!! Why not put the effort into higher efficiency cars instead of experimenting with our planet's atmosphere?
__________________
"I am happy to report that once again the universe is doing just great, thank you, purring with perfection, ever-changing same as always. Light is still cruising along at 186,000 miles per second, and the expanding universe shows no signs of contracting. At this rate, it won't be long before they'll have to let the photon belt out another notch."
Swami Beyondananda's 2007 State of the Universe address
|