Originally Posted by RussT
THE VOIDS AND EXPANSION

It has been known for a long time that most, if not all, of the expansion of the
Universe is seen in the Voids, and that part is very true.
It is actually a very simple concept, that if ‘space’ is ‘physical’, which we now
Realize that it is, then ‘more’ of it HAS to be being added to it on a continual basis
For space to be expanding, since it is not Diluting. If it weren’t for preconceived
Ideas this would be readily accepted!
This is where the real ‘physical’ ‘space’ described above is being added,
continually, to the universe! Dark Matter ‘space’ is coming from all of the
Voids and is the expansion of the universe in all directions at the speed of light!

We are not sure on exactly how much authority one needs to find before this
can Be Taken Seriously, but here are three of the best authorities we could find
for precisely that purpose!

Here is a String Theory paper where just the introduction is pertinent.
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0205055
Introduction;

In string theory there is a problem which cannot be resolved inside of the
theory: Is there an inner structure of the string? If the string is some kind of
matter, then string theory cannot be a fundamental theory of Everything.
We need to have a theory for the string matter. If such matter has an elementary
Structure then we must have a theory for this structure and so on up to infinity.
In fact this is analogous to the well-known old problem of the inner structure
Of electron. Probably the most radical resolution of this problem was suggested
By Einstein. As usual his approach is very revolutionary: the electron does
Not have any material structure, it is a bridge between two asymptotically flat
Spaces (a wormhole in the modern language). One can say that this is Einstein’s
Paradigm for the fundamental structure of Matter.


http://physics.harvard.edu/people/facpages/randall.html

NARRATOR: Randall tried to calculate how gravity could leak from our membrane Universe into empty space, but she couldn't make it work. Then she heard the theory that there might be another membrane in the eleventh dimension. Now she had a really strange thought. What if gravity wasn't leaking from our Universe but to it? What if it came from that other universe? On that membrane, or brane, gravity would be as strong as the other forces, but by the time it reached us it would only be a faint signal. Now when she reworked her calculations everything fitted exactly. Our Bold.


http://www.bautforum.com/showpost.ph...4&postcount=66
Originally Posted by Tim Thompson
What if the other universes are not so "unobservable" after all? What if we have misinterpreted the observations, and the force we interpret as "dark matter", is
really, gravity leaking out of the other universes, and into ours? I can readily imagine a multi-universe theory, which includes such an effect, and therefore is
not simply "consistent" with observation, but actually predicts the observed effects we call dark matter & dark energy, as consequences of the communication of information between universes.


As we have enumerated, since there is little doubt that we see the expansion of
the universe in the huge Voids between the clusters of galaxies, that is where
‘Gravity’ is leaking to our universe, and this is happening in all the major Voids (and maybe the minor ones, if they exist). As shown in the paper, this ‘gravity’ is the DM ‘inert’ ‘base’ elements and makes up ‘all’ of our ‘space’, and is the BGF, traveling at ‘C’. As we have also shown, this is coming from the Massive Black Hole, Planck sized, Kerr Ringed Singularities.
Now, how would we know whether these ‘base’ Planck size/mass inert elements were coming from our universe Massive Black Holes OR as all the authorities above predict, ‘another universe’ outside our own?
The answer to that is actually much easier than anyone at first, may think, but of course will take a full expert GR examination to confirm.
It simply has to do with the “Correct’ time reversals of Massive Black Hole structure, including Einstein-Rosen Bridges.
Now that we have seen, that in an Open System, ‘seeing’ the Progenitor of a MBH is as simple as pulling the singularity up out of the black hole and outside the event horizon, this changes the dynamics of time reversals, and how to be able to see what is on the ‘other side’ of the Ringed Singularity in the MBH’s in our universe.
So, since time should stop, at the Ringed Singularities, for all the Matter that goes into the MBH’s of our universe, that should mean that going forward in time,
Through the Ringed Singularity is impossible. Therefore it would be impossible to see the Einstein-Rosen Bridge (worm hole/ white hole spewing DM) structure from this vantage point at all!
So, the only way we are seeing the Einstein-Rosen Bridge at all, is if we are time reversing it out of the MBH in the universe level ‘above ours’. It really is this simple.
Which simple means, that our MBH’s are releasing their DM Background Gravity
Field, ‘space’, to the universe level below our’s, and that the MBH’s in the universe level above our’s, are releasing their DM Background Gravity field, ‘space’, to us.

Now, there may be an independent way to verify this!
Since the narrative above said Lisa Randall…“ tried to calculate how gravity could leak from our membrane Universe into empty space”, She is talking about ‘our empty space’, and not our MBH’s, so of course this didn’t work, but when she says…
“What if gravity wasn't leaking from our Universe but to it? What if it came from
that other universe? Now when she reworked her calculations everything fitted exactly.” This should be independent corroboration of what we are showing!

What this really means is VERY exciting, because it means that our universe is NOT going to expand away to a very bleak and cold nothingness or contract into
A Big Crunch, BUT with all the MBH’s (with all their new ones being created just as in ours) of the universe level above ours, releasing ‘space’ to us, and our new Galaxies being created about once a day, for the last however many billions of years, that the Multi-Verses are virtually, perpetual galaxy making machines!


CONCLUSION

Although shrinking the ‘whole universe’ down to a point and rebuilding it ‘seems’ like
a perfectly reasonable thing to do, and considering the above Open System evaluation, and the relative ease (Pun Intended!) with which the ‘other’ Planck size singularity can be shown to be where the Unification of GR and QFT take place, we would have to say, that it is only reasonable, if that is what really happened!
The main attribute of the above though, is that it makes everything ‘physical’! All of
‘space’ being the DM Planck size inert elementary element (the appropriate entity can
name it), the gravity that leaks to our universe, is physical, and eliminates the placeholders of DM/DE (Anti-gravity), CDM, False Vacuums, and the unreal ‘gravity makes gravity’, ‘space makes space’. Also, we see the Radiation bursting into our universe, so that makes that physical as well. As for the ring singularity in the Kerr Black Hole: We cannot see the event horizon of any black hole, or the black hole itself (but we are saying they are ‘real’ and have a physical effect), but with the astounding success of Einstein’s General Relativity, and the above showing the ‘physical’ Naked Singularity, and that ‘space’ is now physical, why wouldn’t we believe that Einstein’s math can be shown to be a ‘real’ and ‘physical’ representation of how our universe works!
Actually this is very simple and is just the Inverse of the Big Bang…Massive Black Hole
Singularities start the universe, all of the Darkness of ‘space’ (Gravity) leaking into all the Voids, expanding space, and GRB’s; Naked Singularities Make the Light, The Baryonic Matter, The Galaxies, (EM, Strong and Weak Forces).
We also have very little doubt, that once String/”M” Theory follows this model, it too will prove to be as powerful, if not more-so, than GR.
We think it is pretty darned incredible, that for all these years, the concept of
Baryonic Matter getting here via the Gamma Radiation from a naked singularity, through General Relativity, The Big Bang Theory…And the concept of Fred Hoyle et al, that there should be Trillions of Little Bangs, the Steady State Cosmology, were both in plain view.
It is really to bad that the Fight wound up being; an expanding universe VS a Static universe, rather than, was the Universe Open Or Closed according to the Laws of Thermodynamics, or maybe Fred Hoyle would have been able to realize this during his lifetime!
Well, well well Russ you ARE describing the correct boundary conditions.
So please read the 4 posts of my reply to see the convergence of your ideas with the p[remises of Quantum Relativity.

In appreciation of a philosopher who has seen the gravitational light so to say.

Tony B.