Quote:
Originally Posted by Extropia DaSilva
I would imagine that if plasma cosmologists posited the existence of an object that either violated the laws of relativity or quantum mechanics, this would be held as definitive proof that the theory was catastrophically wrong.
|
Just positing the existence of an object that violates GR and QM does not do a thing. You just use an expensive word for "to propose as an explanation" or "suggest." You have to show evidence too, and up until now, no such evidence exists to my knowledge.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Extropia DaSilva
Well, Thanatos is partially correct. I understand neither plasma cosmology nor it's more accepted alternatives to be considered a voice of authority but rest assured that I do endeavour to understand as far as I am able. Inevitably, given that my interpretations of the 'truth' is always based on imperfect knowledge of an incomplete set of facts, I may well post comments that the senior members will quickly see are flawed.
|
So, you don't understand, but you feel sure that GR and QM are incorrect. I can never quite fathom these attitudes. It is like me (a man) saying that: "I have no idea about breast cancer by women, but I am sure that mammographies are useless and a waste of money"
__________________
Any comments in glorious red are to be considered in ModeratorMode.
善數, 不用籌策 (shàn shù, bù yòng chóu cè)
He who is good at counting, uses no counting tools
“A good scientist has freed himself of concepts and keeps his mind open to what is”
道德經, 二十七 (dào dé jīng, 27)
|