Thread: Catch 22?
View Single Post
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 04-December-2006, 05:19 PM
korjik korjik is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,265
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Extropia DaSilva View Post
Uhuh.

It must be possible to break out of this catch 22, because if it were not there would never have been any paradigm shifts in scientific thinking.

Indeed. One of the unexplored features of the universe are the magnetic fields that stretch across clusters of galaxies. It is proposed that inflation could be responsible for this because, when electrons and protons 1st formed the 1st hydrogen atoms, photons would have scattered off electrons and protons. Being as they are a lot heavier than electrons, the photons would have scattered differently off them, generating small differences in the velocoties of protons and electrons and this would have created electric currents and, therefore, magnetic fields.
This is an excellent example of why there is no catch-22. The mainstream scientist at this point, points out that the inflationary period was 300,000 years before the universe cooled off enough for atoms to form.