Hi Kesh.

I got into this EU 'debate' on another forum and a couple of people assured me that if I were to argue its case amongst propper physicists I would find myself hopelessly out of my depth with EU in tatters.

They certainly seem to be in the right. I AM out of my depth on this forum and nothing I have collected on ES/EU stands as justification to call it a theory, let alone suggest it is superior to anything else.

I have not yet read all the threads on the EU debate so my refutation of it is somewhat cautious. But, certainly, what little I have read is showing it to be the worthless pseudoscience I was always warned it was. (PS, I do not think the ES HYPOTHESIS was psuedoscientific because it put forward a model that could be tested and falsified. Tim Thompson seems to have shown that what evidence exists in its favour is a distortion of the truth and I currently know of ZERO EU papers that put forward a propper scientific argument that quantitively defends the ideas. I therefore consider it BUNK and realise it was psuedoscientific to claim the 'evidence' I had in its favour was otherwise).