Thread: Catch 22?
View Single Post
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 08-December-2006, 05:36 PM
VanderL VanderL is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,606
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eta C View Post
It's the former. The EU gang refuse to let anything like a lack of experimental evidence for their concept stand in their way of declaring everything about physics to be wrong.
I count myself as one of the "EU gang" and I never claimed "everything about physics to be wrong". I don't mind it when you want to state that EU is not a theory (yet, imo), or lacking experimental evidence (and there are areas where this isn't true), but don't characterise the EU gang as declaring everything about physics to be wrong.

I don't know how off-topic we are in this thread, but what facts about binary pulsars disproves the EU concept of electrically powered stars?

Cheers.