Quote:
Originally Posted by Neal Adams
I was not intending to imply that Carl David Anderson was a reference to anything but "Matter is created" the remainder is my extrapolation and presunption from that . I presume that if there is NO OTHER CREATION EVENT that we know of ,...Carl's is the best candidate for matter creation in our universe .
As to the other names ,....pick one ...."A rose by any other name."
Matter was created that had the charteristics of energy mass and field !
When all that entered the "Impact point " was "energy"..
Did Energy strike a standing field , both split and thereby somehow create Mass? What ever happened ,....can we take this singular event and from it create a Universe ?
I ask , because this seems to be the universe's only creation event that we can observe .
No "stories for Children? of a magical Big bang!
I think we can do it.
Neal Adams
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Neil Adams
the remainder is my extrapolation and presunption from that.
|
I see, and a pretty insightful extrapolation it is!
Because "This", implies/presumes/can be shown, that 'space'/the prime matter/DM (Non-baryonic)/pre-matter, that 'fills' the Universe, WAS HERE FIRST!!!
"[Matter is created (google Carl David Anderson) from the prime matter (or aether, or dark matter, or, call it, pre-matter) that fills the universe.]"
[can we take this singular event and from it create a Universe ?]
Which makes the answer to this...NO
[Did Energy strike a standing field , both split and thereby somehow create Mass?]
The answer to this is a little complicated, but the 'standing field' part is NO.
If as you IMPLIED, 'space' is filled with pre-matter/DM (Non-baryonic) which would be a gravity field, and that was here FIRST (Coming "IN" at the Voids, at the speed of light (preserving SR), filling our space)...THEN, two of those 'fields', traveling at "C", "Striking"/colliding/touching each other, and Kaboooooom...........You would have a High Energy Gamma Radiation Event, and THAT would cause Matter Creation
And what would that make???
I can't tell by what I have read so far of your stuff, how 'cosmological' it actually is, but if you would like to pursue this further, I would be happy to.