LOL. Yeah that white blob nearly got us, it's so obviously an F4. erm, F111. erm, UAV. Erm, missile. Erm, small commuter jet.
Quote:
|
I used to see the same tactics back at the Loose Change moon thread--when cornered, deny the obvious with a patronizing attitude.
|
Unlike you of course. I can't even repeat what you slinged at me in that thread, as it's almost all bannable overhere. But what does it matter, you determined I was a disinfo agent eh.
But hey, for fun, let's just take some out of your last post.
Quote:
|
You were so backed into a corner that all you could do was deny the obvious
|
Quote:
|
even though you made yourselves look silly doing it.
|
Quote:
|
I don't know how you guys can keep a straight face
|
Quote:
|
you're not moving anybody with any brains.
|
Quote:
|
Objective people of normal intelligence like the ones at this link believe what they see--not what they'e told they see.
|
Quote:
|
It's obvious to anyone with half a brain. All you're doing by denying it is making yourselves look silly.
|
Quote:
|
No objective person who can see could say it's blurry with a straight face.
|
Quote:
|
the smoke argument is ridiculous.
|
Aaah, that was one nice, respectful post, unlike our patronizing attitude.
Quote:
|
I can understand why you do it though; you guys can't admit 9/11 was an inside job.
|
Not without very serious evidence.
Quote:
|
I consider that picture to be proof that whatever hit the Pentagon was not a 757. Show something that you consider to be proof that is was a 757 and we can discuss whether it constitutes conclusive proof.
|
How many more times do we need to mention the pics of victims, the pics of 757 debris, the pics of damage of the same width as the wing, the animation showing how a 757's width could knock down the light poles, the eye witnesses seeing a 757, the fact that a 757 was hijacked and never seen again, the fact that the family members of the people inside never saw them again? But that's all nothing, because there is a white blob in that frame! What about the next frames showing the white spreading out, what about the frame showing a possible 757 outline in front of it, what about all alternatives proposed by you for a 757 are not only far less likely, but also are not fitting with the other evidence?