Quote:
Originally Posted by David C
Quote:
|
Since you have been reminded to answer direct questions, I will ask you again, as I did in post 530, since you dismiss all the evidence we present to you as either planted or from people who are part of the plot, please present evidence that the video you say is proof has not been altered and actually depicts events that happened on 9/11/01 at the Pentagon. Shalamar has also asked for similar information. And you can not just claim that is good evidence because it was released by the government, since you dismiss all the other evidence released by the government.
|
As I've said before--whether it's been altered is a debatable point. There is no proof I can offer. All I can say is that if it hasn't been altered, the object is the nose of something other than a 757 and 9/11 was an inside job. If it has been altered, it was a very illogical thing for the government to do as they altered it to make it look like the nose of a fighter instead of the nose of a 757. It is highly unlikely that they did that so it probably hasn't been altered. |
My Bold
If you can offer no proof, no matter how illogical you think it might be, then it is NOT PROOF and it is not even evidence (a difference you seem to love). We have answered all your quesions, and you just dismiss them; fine, I dismiss your evidence.
And if it so illogical, then how logical is your idea, that the single piece of evidence that proves the government did it was released to the public?
But on top of that, as Count Zero said "Putting forth a mere plausibility as proof is not scientific." So all of your "could have" and "might have" are not proof of anything. So stop with all the "Barbara Olson might have a new ID" and "the airplane parts were planted before the crash", you have to prove any of your wild ideas. And proof isn't someone else on the internet has the same silly idea and has a website and a video about it.