I'm still waiting to hear your comments on this.
Quote:
http://www.physics911.net/georgenelson.htm
(excerpt)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In all my years of direct and indirect participation, I never witnessed nor even heard of an aircraft loss, where the wreckage was accessible, that prevented investigators from finding enough hard evidence to positively identify the make, model, and specific registration number of the aircraft -- and in most cases the precise cause of the accident. This is because every military and civilian passenger-carrying aircraft have many parts that are identified for safety of flight. That is, if any of the parts were to fail at any time during a flight, the failure would likely result in the catastrophic loss of aircraft and passengers. Consequently, these parts are individually controlled by a distinctive serial number and tracked by a records section of the maintenance operation and by another section called plans and scheduling.
|
Quote:
Has the government announced that the serial numbers of the parts found in the crash match the plane that was flight 77? I haven't seen anything released by the government that said so.
So let me get this straight.
Every piece of evidence, like victim DNA, plane parts, eye witnesses, radar tracks, black boxes, etc etc could of been faked, planted, mistaken, bought off, etc etc and now you expect us to believe that a few serial numbers would somehow convince you.
I never said it would convince me as that can be faked too. I said it was suspicious that the government didn't talk about serial numbers on parts found in the wreckage as that would be part of the scenario if it had really happened.
I was watching a movie once about a murder. Before committing the murder the murderer consulted an old seasoned criminal. The old seasoned criminal told him that when planning a crime there are fifty ways you can screw up and an intelligent person is only going to think of twenty five of them. If the government isn't talking about the serial numbers on the parts found matching the craft that was flight 77, it's circumstantial evidence that it's a detail that they didn't think of when they were planning the crime.
|
If this is a doctored picture, it was doctored by the government before they released it.
http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon...dodvideos.html
Someone asked why they waited five years to release it. I don't remember the reason they gave. I think it was just pressure to release video as a lot of people thought that they had a lot more video than they weren't releasing. I think the video is probably not doctored. The circumstantial evidence that it wasn't a 757 is pretty strong too. As far as I know the government hasn't talked about matching serial numbers from plane parts to the craft that was flight 77. That's highly suspicious. There's also the issue of the lack of video even though there were cameras all over the place. There's also the other very strong evidence that 9/11 was an inside job such as building 7 and the fact that the towers fell down symetrically and that there weren't any big plane parts at the site where flight 93 was said to have crashed. When we look at the big picture, I think it's pretty clear that 9/11 was an inside job.
I remember when the DC-10 that took off from Chicago back in 79 lost an engine and the uneven weight caused the plane to turn 90 degrees sideways. When it hit the ground its wings were pointed up and down. I see from the post that the wings of the 747 were in the same position when it hit the apartment building. Is that true? I looked at the pictures and I couldn't see any marks where the wings hit. Were the wings pointed up and down when it hit the apartment building?
I want to do more but that's all the time I have today.