Evolution explains after the fact; it is an historical theory if anything.

But "predicting random mutations" strikes me as oxymoronic.



Are random mutations acting in accordance with repeatable, testable, natural laws?

__________________
"Where the telescope ends, the microscope begins. Which of the two has the greater view?" - Hugo

"Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened." - Churchill