Quote:
Originally Posted by David C
|
It is nearly impossible to tell which part of the Pentagon to use in that low resolution photo. You also have to take into account the effects of the lense which has curved everything. It is much more accurate to use trigonometry. Why have you been avoiding that? Plus, that picture seems to support that it would be blocked by the box.
Your continued insistence that all the other evidence could have been planted is laughable. There is no evidence whatsoever for any planting. All it does is include hundreds of other people that for some reason have not said anything. The more people that need to be included, the more unlikely it is that they would keep quiet about the murder of thousands.
Faking the DNA evidence is nearly impossible too. Every sample of that type would have been marked with a "chain of custody" stamp and paperwork that needed to be signed by every person handling it. Any sign of tampering with the packages would have invalidated those samples. Of course you'll just come back and say that the lab could be in on it. That means then that many more people that have to be in on it. Your scheme gets more and more unlikely by the second. All you have is a couple of blurry photos. What would it take for you to admit there is a ton more evidence in favor of a 757 crashing into the Pentagon? Remember, if your plan calls for everyone to believe that a 757 hit the building, you are going to have a 757 go missing and all the people inside it as well, why would you then use something else and run the chance of a tourist with a camera exposing the entire plot? It doesn't make sense and neither do you.