In the interest of this thread, the readers and participants and politeness, I am taking a page from the ATM section. Here are seven, although there are many more, questions that David C have not answered. David C, before posting anymore videos, CT sites, etc., please take the time to answer these seven questions to the best of your ability. "I don't know", "I don't understand please clarify," or "I need a little more time" are acceptable answers. You will have a week to answer these questions. Do not start another thread on this same issue or I will close it. Do not post any "new" stuff on this thread or I will close it until you PM me that you are ready to answer the questions. Please include Laguna2's mathematical analysis he will post later today. Other Members please do not ask David C any questions until he has answered the questions listed below and Laguna2's painstaking analysis.

1. Why do you not believe that terrorists were responsible or capable of carrying out the events of 9/11?

2. Please explain the mechanics and dynamics involved in a "planting operation" that plants evidence either immediately before or immediately after the crash, which takes into account the known laws of physics, lack of time-travel and personal invisibility, lack of witness accounts, and the fact that in your beloved video, there are no personnel on the lawn, nor are there any parts or body pieces on the lawn, ruling out pre-planting of any kind. Please also explain the dynamics of planting biological evidence inside the burning wreck of the Pentagon in the immediate seconds after the crash, using the above criteria and takes into account the heat and difficulty of navigating the wreckage. Stealthy extraction is also a necessity. Again, as usual, please apply Occam's Razor to your answer.

3. Please explain why scientifically peer-reviewed evidence is immediately and always unreliable, but anonymous you-tube and woo-woo videos are gospel truth.

4. Please explain Steven Jones' continuing credibility in this area.

5. Demonstrate, in your opinion, why the structural damage to the Pentagon should be consistent with the structural damage to the Twin Towers.

6. Demonstrate rumormill.coms credentials and why they are a valid source of evidence.

7. You have stated the photo you use has been doctored. Please explain why it is still usable as evidence, when undoctored photos have been dismissed by you as "doctored" or "planted". Please explain why the standards of evidence should not work both ways.

__________________
Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.
Albert Einstein