Thread: 911 pentagon
View Single Post
  #1133 (permalink)  
Old 28-December-2006, 07:53 PM
Woody- Woody- is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 81
Default

Quote:
The flights would have been intercepted and four people armed with only box-cutters would be overpowered easily by a few hundred passengers.
Your using post 9/11 hindsight to interpret a pre 9/11 event, standing orders pre 9/11 were to let the hijackers land the plane somewhere and then negotiate or use force as the situation called for.

Quote:
Stuff could have been planted inside the building very easily before the crash and anything could have been put into a robot plane such as bodies, 757 plane parts, etc.
"could have been", I see, no real evidence just handwaving that it could have been.

Quote:
When I was shown this "YouTube" video, I didn't reject it because it was from YouTube. http://youtube.com/watch?v=YVDdjLQkUV8 I pointed out the the flaws in it.
You have pointed out no flaws, your argument has only been "I dont believe it"

Quote:
Here's an example of what makes sense.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...81047&q=9%2F11
At the 48 min. 45 sec. mark thermite is demostrated. At the 54 minute 18 second mark some liquid metal is shown pouring out of one of the towers. At the 56 minute 35 second mark Steven Jones gives his opinion of the molten metal pouring out of the towers. He said the NIST report explained it as possibly molten aluminum from the plane. They melted some aluminum and it never changed color. Steven Jones refuted the NIST report.
http://wtc.nist.gov/ Steven Jones makes more sense than the official sources do.
Go to the 49 minute 35 second mark of this video. It shows some steel beams that look like they were cut by thermite.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...71955308136871
The steel beams have solidified molten metal on them. That's an impossibility if the only heat source was jet fuel.
This has nothing to do with the Pentagon, you are following the CT script, if all else fails change the subject.

Quote:
There should at least be a wing mark on the side of the building. The damage on the building might have come from the inside.
http://0911.site.voila.fr/index2.htm
(fifth picture down)
There is damage to the side of the building in the fifth pic down. The red line drawn from the left wingtip leads right to a row of missing masonry between the windows on the first floor. The damage the right wing caused to the masonry is covered by foam in that pic but in the top pic you can see the damage to the masonry from the right wing, above and to the left of the question mark on the right side.
__________________
Reality is for those that can't handle video games.