Quote:
Originally Posted by David C
The flights would have been intercepted and four people armed with only box-cutters would be overpowered easily by a few hundred passengers.
|
A lot of folks have pointed out the difference between pre- and post-9/11 hijacking response protocols. No need to repeat.
But, what's this comment about intercepting the flights? Have you ever looked at a timeline for the 9/11 events? Do you know when the FAA first realized they had a hijacking? Do you know the protocols for handling such an event? Do you know the protocols for involving the military? Dop you know how many fighters are kept on ready alert status, and where? Do you have any idea how long it would take a fighter to reach one of the hijacked planes?
Or, are you just blowin' smoke?
Quote:
Originally Posted by David C
Stuff could have been planted inside the building very easily before the crash and anything could have been put into a robot plane such as bodies, 757 plane parts, etc.
|
And no one noticed all this "stuff" being brought into the building?
Also, your mystery plane has gone form F4 to F111 to "robot plane" big enough to carry "bodies, 757 plane parts, etc." Which is it?
Quote:
Originally Posted by David C
... What we have to look for is what makes the most sense--not the credentials of who says what.
|
Which is
exactly what we've been doing. You have been presented with evidence that makes sense, that fits the observations and events. Yet, you keep running back to one, lousy (and I mean, of course, blurry) frame from a parking lot sercurity camera with a fish eye lens.
Quote:
Originally Posted by David C
... Steven Jones gives his opinion... Steven Jones refuted... Steven Jones makes more sense than the official sources do.
|
Steven Jones is a physicist who has tried his hand at structural engineering. The man doesn't even know the difference between stainless steel and structural steel. He has been refuted by his own university.
Steven Jones' opinion on 9/11 and a quarter will get you a cup of coffee.
Quote:
Originally Posted by David C
Honest people with common sense is [sic] nothing to sneeze at. Some of them have credentials and some of them don't. What they say adds up and the official story doesn't add up.
|
Common sense doesn't always work in the technical world.
And, the official story adds up very nicely.
Quote:
Originally Posted by David C
What I said was that whether or not it had been doctored was open to debate. I distictly said I thought it most probably hadn't been doctored.
|
But you never explained how the Evil Gubmint could let such an obvious piece of evidence get past them.
Quote:
Originally Posted by David C
You guys seem to think that the idea of 9/11 being an inside job is ridiculous. ...
|
Yeah, bascially. But, not because any of us will simply take the goverment's (any government's) word for what happened. We have looked at the evidence and the reports made concerning that evidence from qualified, independent sources.
The "official story" makes sense.