Continuation of last post
Quote:
Actually I have never read an american newspaper in my life.
If you like to see my main newssites:
|
A lot of non-American newspapers are controlled by the same group that controls American newpapers. Take a look at this.
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Ru...rbergClub.html
I was referring to info you get by talking to people from third world contries. They give a very different analysis of what's happening from mainstream newspapers.
Sites like these give the same analyses of events and situations in the countries that the people from the coutries give.
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com
http://www.zmag.org/weluser.htm
If you base your opinions on what mainstream newspapers say, it seems inconceivable that the US government could plan and carry out 9/11. If you read stuff from those two site above, it doesn't seem so inconceivable.
Here's some other good stuff that helps put everything into perspective.
http://www.nadir.org/nadir/initiativ...propaganda.htm
http://www.nadir.org/nadir/initiativ...atingenemy.htm
http://video.google.es/videoplay?doc...q=terror+storm
Quote:
When I was shown this "YouTube" video, I didn't reject it because it was from YouTube. http://youtube.com/watch?v=YVDdjLQkUV8 I pointed out the the flaws in it.
You have pointed out no flaws, your argument has only been "I dont believe it"
|
This is from post 935
Quote:
I've said what I thought of this video several times.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=YVDdjLQkUV8
Look at the 2 min. 19 sec. mark. The plane is too short to be a 757 in this simulation too.
Look at the 3 min. 58 sec. mark. The damage shown in the video is inconsistent with this picture.
http://s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Ch...pic=4223&st=30
That video is an attempt at damage-control by the people who planned and carried out 9/11. They hire public relations companies to think this stuff up. They probably have their own public relations department too.
|
Quote:
|
This has nothing to do with the Pentagon, you are following the CT script, if all else fails change the subject.
|
I used it to answer a question--not change the subject.
Quote:
|
There is damage to the side of the building in the fifth pic down. The red line drawn from the left wingtip leads right to a row of missing masonry between the windows on the first floor. The damage the right wing caused to the masonry is covered by foam in that pic but in the top pic you can see the damage to the masonry from the right wing, above and to the left of the question mark on the right side.
|
Why are you so sure?
Quote:
|
I also would like your response to what I posted in post 1058. Remember, there was debris and human remains outside of the Pentagon. This could not have been planted before the crash. You need to explain how that was done.
|
As I've said before. Bodies could have been put in the robot plane very easily. The DNA report could have been falsified. To be sure whether or not stuff was planted we would need a continuous video of the area lasting several hours starting at the time of the crash. Without that it can't be proven either way.
Start watching this at the 48 minute mark until the part where the molten metal pours out of the towers just before the collapse.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...81047&q=9%2F11
An objective person would give a lot of importance to this. I want to hear your explanations for this. As far as I'm concerned this is another one of the many pieces of proof that closes the whole case.