I know this is a bit off topic, but...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by David C
You're presuming the moon hoax theory has been debunked. It hasn't been debunked any more than the inside job theory has been debunked. I've seen the videos that are off-line now and I asked the pro-Apollo people for explanations of the evidence offered in them. They did the same thing they're doing here--give lame explanations with a patronizing and then just consider it to be debunked.
|
Oh please.
It's even easier to debunk the Moon Hoax than the 9/11 theories, IMO.
You show here that you'd rather believe a video by someone who is unqualified/misinformed/seeking attention simply because it either "makes more sense" or that it fits your view of things.
I can only conclude that you hold an anti-US view, and thus are willing to believe any "alternative explaination" that support this view.
Hardly objective.
The way I see it, if the evidence doesn't fit, then it's not a plausible alternative.
The difference between you and me (and several others on the board) is that what we see as evidence is different from your view.
Your claim of the white object that you claim to be a fighter plane is a good example of this thinking.
Here's advice you keep ignoring: Occam's Razor. Learn it, use it.