View Single Post
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 02-January-2007, 02:54 PM
Doodler's Avatar
Doodler Doodler is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Maryland
Posts: 9,412
Send a message via AIM to Doodler Send a message via MSN to Doodler
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sporally View Post
What the... I had heard that exoplanets were found before 1995 orbiting pulsars though 1995 is considered the year of the first proof of an exoplanet, but i didn't know they were this small. I just consulted my favorite exoplanet site where all known exoplanets are listet and i found one the mass of Pluto.

http://exoplanet.eu/planet.php?p1=PSR+1257%2B12&p2=b

But how could we detect exoplanets back in 1992? Are exoplanets or exocomets easier to detect when they are orbiting pulsars? Can't see why this is so - unless they cover for the big flash the pulsars make. But the mass of Pluto, wow. Edit: Gliese 876 d is considered to be the smallest exoplanet to date AFAIK, with a mass of 2.3% of Jupiters mass, found in 2005.
To be fair, most planet hunters tend to disregard the pulsar planets because of their utter uninhabitability. The new rave is planets orbiting main sequence stars.
__________________
I'm not completely heartless, the doctor who removed it told me he'd never be able to get it all.
Reply With Quote