View Single Post
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 06-January-2007, 01:52 PM
Nereid Nereid is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 9,644
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gravitino View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nereid
Which is a nice word salad, but as science it is about as close to nonsense as one can get ... if the universe obeys GR, then "a burst of energy from prior conditions" is gibberish (a GR universe contains all the mass-energy and nothing but the mass-energy of the universe).
So, according to BB, all started with a single point that encapsulates ALL necessary energy to create all matter found in these milions of bilions of galaxies !!!
Hard to accept, unless space-t expansion is creating matter or matter is self-creating, or ... perhaps matter is contra intuitive !!!
You've completely lost me I'm afraid ... would you mind explaining what this post of yours has to do with modern (mainstream) cosmology, or GR?

Or, perhaps, you are presenting an ATM idea, dressed up in words that have a slightly-less-than-random relationship with modern physics?

Or maybe you are simply (very) confused about what the concordance model in cosmology (a.k.a. "BB") actually is? Is so, why not start a thread in the Q&A section? Perhaps something like "according to the Big Bang Theory, the universe started with a single point that encapsulates ALL necessary energy to create all matter found in these milions of bilions of galaxies - is this an accurate summary of modern cosmology?" or "according to the Big Bang Theory, is space-time expansion creating matter? or is matter self-creating?"
Reply With Quote