The videos in this link make a pretty good case for 9/11 being an inside job.
http://www.question911.com/linksall.htm

Be sure to watch "Painful Deceptions", "Loose Change", "In plane Sight", and "The Great Conspiracy".

Here are three more good ones.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...71955308136871
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...81047&q=9%2F11
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...04017463126290


A good case is made about the use of thermite to bring down the towers in this article.

http://www.wtc7.net/articles/WhyIndeed09.pdf

This video shows what looks like molten metal pouring out of the towers.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...aplanet+9%2F11

What looks like molten metal pouring out of the tower is explained in more detail starting at the 48 minute mark of this video.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...81047&q=9%2F11

There was still molten metal in the wreckage long after 9/11.
http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/e...lten_metal.jpg


There's a debate here about the use of themite.
http://worcester.indymedia.org/news/...95_comment.php
(excerpt)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-any metal smith can tell you that slag does not drip like shown since most slag is blown away and only a ribbon of slag remains above and below the cut typically with maybe a short drip or 2.. -any metal smith can also tell you that any cut would have been traced completely around the outside of the column, torch cutting does not leave slag on the outside of a cut, only on the backside. YOU SHOULD NOT HAVE SLAG dripping on the outside. This proves it was not torch cut and that it was Thermate, with no air pressure behind it which is why there is slag "running" down the inside and outside. -any metal cutter would also question why the rear cut is not a straight line, or why the cuts are not straight or horizontal all the way around.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I've used a cutting torch to cut steel before and my experience squares with what this person says. I've never seen molten steel drip like the way it did in the picture. Also, the drips would have been on the inside.

This was being discussed on the Pentagon thread when it got closed. We never did get to continue with the discussion. Somebody said that the substance pouring out of the tower was probably burning wood embers but I never got to answer because the thread was closed. There's my answer above. The hardened metal under the cut doesn't look like it came from a cutting torch so it was probably thermite.


Also--
On post 1094 of this page of the Pentagon thread 911 pentagon I was asked to answer a list of questions.

In post 1123 of the next page 911 pentagon I answered the questions.

In the last post of the thread 911 pentagon (post 1166) the moderator said I hadn't answered the questions and closed the thread giving that as the reason for his closing it.
Question for the moderator--why did you say I hadn't answered the questions when the answsers to the questions were in post #1123? I want to hear an explanation from the moderator on this.

My question on post #1148 was never answered because the thread was closed. We were discussing the mathematical proof that Laguna2 presented in post #1096. I'd like an answer to my question.

Here it is.
As I've already mentioned before--the photo of the nose of the plane that hit the Pentagon are obviously not the nose of a 757.
http://img65.imageshack.us/img65/730...on01gif8hw.gif
http://www.hongpong.com/lib/images/p...ntrast_adj.jpg

Unless this is a doctored photo, this settles the whole issue. That is the nose of an executive jet or a military plane--not an airliner. As far as I'm concerned the whole case is closed--9/11 was an inside job. I've never seen a good arguement from people who believe the official version.