View Single Post
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 14-January-2007, 02:37 PM
David C David C is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 155
Default

Quote:
Your "side" makes a big deal about how never, ever before in history have skyscrapers been brought down by fire, yet on 9/11 it is "claimed" that three fell due to it (you always forget the impacts...)
There were no impacts on building 7.


Quote:
However, you claim they were taken down by thermite/thermate. How many demolition jobs have been done using thermite? Can you name any CDs that used it? Would not your claim be equally "implausible" by it's apparent lack of precedent as well?
The stuff I posted shows that it can be done. There is a video of what looks like the same stuff that comes from burning thermite pouring out of the tower just before the tower fell. I don't see how anybody can just ignore that. You are less than objective.

Quote:
The onis is on you to prove yourself right...not on us to prove you wrong.
As I said in the first post of this thread--as far as I'm concerned the evidence I've presented closes the whole case--9/11 was an inside job. I rest my case on it. If you think what I've presented is inconclusive, tell me why.