View Single Post
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 14-January-2007, 05:35 PM
Dave J Dave J is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 799
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David C View Post
There were no impacts on building 7.




The stuff I posted shows that it can be done. There is a video of what looks like the same stuff that comes from burning thermite pouring out of the tower just before the tower fell. I don't see how anybody can just ignore that. You are less than objective.


As I said in the first post of this thread--as far as I'm concerned the evidence I've presented closes the whole case--9/11 was an inside job. I rest my case on it. If you think what I've presented is inconclusive, tell me why.
No impacts on 7? What about the tons of falling steel from WTC1? What about the gaping hole reported by the firefighters? What about the structural damage they reported? The creaking noises? Oh, most certainly 7 was impacted and suffered serious fire.
The "molten" material falling from the tower's corner...if this was thermite initiating the CD collapse, should there not be a LOT more sightings of the stuff, as it had to be planted all around the structure? Why just this one sighting? And again, what other CD has ever used thermate/ite? I'm not ignoring the sighting, I'm just not "assuming" it's thermite/ate. When was the thermate planted? How? Your CD theory has just too many questions that noone has ever answered.