I see nothing in these videos that cannot be explained by clever editing, ignorance of the subject matter, and outright lying.

I'll need to see supporting evidence from other sources--ideally original sources, not second-hand video clip interpretations--and solid answers to the technical and historical questions raised in this thread, before I can accept the story told by these videos over the official story.

I'm sorry, David, but the official story has a lot less holes in it. If you can't see that...

(I mean, the video clips themselves are second-hand interpretations of the evidence. David C's analysis of the clips is, of course, third-hand. It'd be nice to see David's analysis of the evidence itself, rather than his analysis of someone else's video interpretations of the evidence.)