I just want to say that the moderators of this forum use some pretty low tactics.
First example--
9/11 was an inside job
On post #22 of this thread I said this.
Quote:
|
That's all the time I have today. I'll continue in a day or two.
|
The only post by Tinaa before that had been this.
Quote:
|
David C do not start your video clip posting marathon again. Just like the movies, anyone can create anything on video. If you do not start using your own words this thread will be closed - sooner rather than later.
|
(post #19)
The next day there was another post by Tinaa that hadn't been there before my last post on the first day.
This is part of it.
Quote:
|
This is your assignment David C: Write up what YOU think happened. No videos, no web sites, just your idea of what really happened. Post it today - before 6:00 PM CST - OR I will close this thread.
|
It was pretty low of you to put this before my last post after I signed off for the day and logged out. If I had seen that message about the 6:00 deadline, I wouldn't have simply said "That's all the time I have today. I'll continue in a day or two.". I would have explained that I wouldn't have time to do any lengthy writing for a couple of days. Did you want the viewers to think that I was ignoring the deadline? Post #22 was post # 21 the day before the thread was closed.
Second example--
This is from the first post of the thread.
Quote:
Also--
On post 1094 of this page of the Pentagon thread 911 pentagon I was asked to answer a list of questions.
In post 1123 of the next page 911 pentagon I answered the questions.
In the last post of the thread 911 pentagon (post 1166) the moderator said I hadn't answered the questions and closed the thread giving that as the reason for his closing it.
Question for the moderator--why did you say I hadn't answered the questions when the answsers to the questions were in post #1123? I want to hear an explanation from the moderator on this.
|
I still want to hear an explanation from the moderator about why he said I hadn't addressed the questions put to me when I had.
I asked some specific questions about some specific issues on that thread. Here is one of them.
Quote:
My question on post #1148 was never answered because the thread was closed. We were discussing the mathematical proof that Laguna2 presented in post #1096. I'd like an answer to my question.
Here it is.
Quote:
You state that the box is about five meters away from the camera in this proof you did.
http://www.flugplatzsiedlung.de/Pent_gate.pdf
Getting the correct distance of the box from the camera and the width of the box are pretty important in a proof like this. A small mistake in precision will throw the whole thing off. I want to see some more detail in how you got those numbers.
That's why I wanted to use the side of the Pentagon as the basis for the calculations--it's a lot clearer.
|
I was referring to post #1148 on this page.
911 pentagon
The thermite issue was also being discussed on the Pentagon thread.
post #1163
Quote:
|
It ahs never been proven what that is. It could be metal, it could be plastic, it could even be wood. At the low resolution and being zoomed in all you can tell is it is something that is glowing and falling. It is not definitely molten. Burning wood embers breaking off looks very similar. Personally, I think it is either plastic or a light metal like aluminum from some office furniture.
|
I wanted to continue this discussion.
I also wanted to discuss this.
http://worcester.indymedia.org/news/...95_comment.php
We started talking about this on the Penagon thread and didn't finish because the thread was closed.
I posted enough issues to start a healthy discussion and I posted some videos so anyone who wanted to add something could have done so. Why don't you want to discuss the issues I posted? Can't you deal with those issues? Asking me to write a lengthy summary of the info that was already there was a pretty lame excuse for closing the thread.
I also asked several times for an explanation on why the moderator said I hadn't answered the questions put to me when I had in the Pentagon thread. It was ignored every time.
Please answer the question.