That is his style (on GLP too).

His posts always consist of:

1. Vague and unclear refrences to some hoax or some-such thing.
2. The claim he revealed it world-wide first-time.
3. Questions.
4. Links to semi-related things.
5. Links to other posts by him.

I once figured his "style" was to lead people to the conclusion (that he thought was correct) by guiding them with questions.

[I think that is a valid teaching method.]

However, I personally have never really understood anything he's getting at. There's plenty of his stuff on GLP right now, if you want to get dirty. Even Hubble (space telescope) is a hoax too, apparently. Also Dinosaurs and continental drift.

Cheers,


P.S. I like how the existence of stellar parallax is used by HB's to "explain" why there were no fake stars put in Apollo photos... (I love woo-woo versus woo-woo.)

__________________
Reality moves at the speed of light.
If the text of this post is blue, it's a "Moderator comment".
[ The RULES of the Forum ] [ Forum FAQs ] [ Conspiracy Theory advice ] [ Alternate Theory Advice ]
To report a post (even this one) to the moderation team - use the /!\ icon at the top-right of the post.