View Single Post
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 17-February-2007, 04:41 AM
01101001's Avatar
01101001 01101001 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 10,367
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AquarianEssence View Post
I have been looking for current information on the Allias effect findings and came across this thread. From what I've read there were plans to carefully repeat these observations to prove or disprove the deviation during the 1999 and 2005 eclipses but I haven't been able to find anything on it other than here: http://science.nasa.gov/newhome/head...t06aug99_1.htm.
The wikipedia article seems to contradict the nasa article.
The Wikipedia article is Allais Effect, just so we have the link again.

Noever's planned look for the effect appears not to have happened. A dubious pro-Allais-effect site, allais.info (WARNING: Guard your eyes; the author appears to hate good website design), has this about Noever:

Quote:
nothing seems to have come of the 1999 eclipse experiments
It looks to me that the number of failed attempts at replication are enough to explain why the effect doesn't seem to gain traction with the mainstream. That occasionally some experimenters get odd results, makes me think that people who are interested in the topic should continue to invest their time, resources, and efforts to figuring out what is going on.

I await the persuasive data. I don't believe I shall go seeking it though.

You may enjoy Against the Mainstream topics Allais effect casts doubt on GR? and The Strange Disappearance of Maurice Allais.
__________________
0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0....
Reply With Quote