Quote:
Originally Posted by tofu
Is Pen completely blind to the fact that Rogan keeps interupting?? Come on!
|
I'm having a lot of trouble with Penn believing that Rogan was being "sincere" in his "questioning". (ie. "I don't know if they went or not"). Rogan's behavior was demonstratively pro-hoax. I thought Penn was smarter than that.
Quote:
|
And BA, would it be too much to ask for you to stand up for yourself a little more? Tell that guy to sit down and shut up
|
Now just because Rogan behaved in an unseemly manner doesn't mean that the BA should resort to
those same "tactics"...and make no mistake, the constant interruption WAS a tactic. Every time Phil started to make a point, Rogan would change the subject or interject a nonsequiter(sp). Not only was it a "tactic"...it was an HB tactic.
Rogan was far from being an unbiased observer asking questions...he gave all indications of being a
true believer.
Rogan's "debating style" (if you can call it that) reminded me of the little "yappy" dogs that nip at your heels...one swift kick* usually takes care of them.
(*I am not advocating that anyone should kick Joe Rogan...then again, he might benefit from the
Aldrin treatment.
)