Quote:
Originally Posted by UncleJohn
If one looks at 9/11 scientifically, one soon finds that beyond a shadow of doubt that it was an inside job. Instead of heaping ridicule on the fringe truth seekers, one should start out dealing the ridicule to our government. By and large, we fringe truth seekers are the ones pointing out the truth of our reality.
|
I will tolerate 2012 stuff, tolerate UFO and Hoagie-land stuff, but I have no tolerance for 9/11 conspiracy nonsense, whatsoever. Politically, I've got a libertarian streak that runs wide and deep and I could write tomes of ridicule and rants against our friendly neighboorhood gubmint. But the idea that 9/11 was perpetrated by some government conspiracy is the biggest, most poisonous load of unadulerated excrement to come down the pike in quite a while.
There is absolutely nothing scientific about that at all. "Beyond a shadow of doubt" indeed -- lord help the man accused if you sit on his jury with that standard of "reasonable doubt". This defintion of "scientific" you use certainly puts quite a belly laughing irony on your previous demands for "scientific answers", here.
Government sources about 2012, eh? Name 'em. Deputy Barney Fife might get something like that in his head from reading too much on the internet, and he might be a government source in the broadest sense, but Andy would get him straightened out soon. Listen to Andy, not Barney.
-Richard