Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Santa
But, I think that you guys have completely missed the point of both of his pages to be honest. He doesn't say that Man didn't go to the Moon, he says that the photographic evidence released by Nasa is not a true representation of the event. That would explain why he also has a page about anomalies on the Moon.
|
Actually those are the same lines found in the openning of Percy and Bennett's book Dark Moon. I know these people are either totally clueless or just liars. I'll give you an example. In Dark Moon, there is a whole section on the landing of the Apollo 12 LM and the Surveyor III lunar lander. They say Surveyor III should be covered with dust, but say it 's not. Unfortunately, they only looked at and presented photographs that showed no dust, but they didn't examine the entire record. If you go to,
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/Hi...2/20153788.jpg
and look at the mirror, you can see that Pete Conrad has wiped his glove across it, removing the dust.
Totally clueless or liars.