Anyone else notice the nature of flasehoods? Lies have a certain "look and feel" to them.

Either we went to the moon or we did not go to the moon. Only one is the truth and only one is a lie.

By their nature, Truths have a certain characteristic. That characteristic, of course, is the fact it is unchanging. Every report about a truth tells the same basic story. Every version of man's voyage to the moon is a copy of the other as far as the facts go.

On the other hand, every version of a scenerio where we did NOT go to the moon presents a different scenerio from one to the next. Each book has a different theory about what was real and what was fake. The WHO, WHAT, WHY, WHEN and even the HOW differs wildly from one hoax theory to the next.

Truths NEVER contradict each other.

Lies ALWAYS contradict each other.

Anyone else notice this, or am I digging up an old issue here?

(I edited this because of a mispelling -- I did not alter any basic information because it is the Truth)