Quote:
|
Originally Posted by cyrek1
cyreks reply:
To iron4:
Good reasoning!
The big bangers are in a quandery regarding the beginning.
It is about time they quit pushing a false ideology on us all.
|
Would you mind telling us your stance? Are you a creationist, steady-state'ist, whatever-you-call-the-theory-that-all-matter-was-not-at-one-point-in-what-big-bangists-would-call-the-beginning-but-only-very-close'ist, or something-else-altogether'ist?
Quote:
honest monkey:
Your solutions are nothing but virtual concepts.
|
Could you be more specific?
Quote:
Pi Man:
Forget the 'big crunch. Current data refutes that idea.
|
I don't personally believe that the universe will end in a Gnab Gib, but it's possible. The universe is accelerating in its expansion, but that could be just because a force is splitting into two forces very slowly(as all the forces split soon after the big bang: Strong, Weak, Electric, Magnetic, etc...) and only in the coldest parts of space. Once the force splits completely, the universe may slow, stop, and reverse to end in a Gnab Gib, or, it may accelerate in it's expansion forever and doom the universe to a cold death.
Quote:
To wedgebert:
The big bangers conveniently evade the beginning because they have no answer. No answer qualifies for a
zero
|
Again, I ask, "Do you have a better idea?"
Quote:
dgruss23
Evading empirical experimental data is not the way to go.
|
Please do us a favor and tell us what
you believe!