Quote:
Originally Posted by truedream
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nereid
(my bold)
By 'theory', do you mean 'speculative idea', or 'guess'? Or 'scientific theory'? Or something else.
If you mean 'scientific theory', can you please give some references to papers which present this theory, in relevant peer-reviewed publications?
|
First we don’t have peer-reviewed publications process for basic science and basic laws, because we have passed that age of it 100 or 200 years before.
Now we are in advance level with many branches of science and peer-review process. |
First, you didn't answer my question; please do so.
Second, the view in the part of your post that I am quoting here is itself very much an ATM view of the nature of science, in the 21st century.
Unfortunately, BAUT's scope is astronomy and space, so a detailed exposition, together with challenges etc, is beyond the scope of this board. However, if you wish to defend these ATM ideas, re the nature of science, please say so (and I, for one, will ask direct, pertinent questions on those ATM ideas, as you present them).
Quote:
"As long as the laws of the mathematics refer to the reality, they are not exact;and while they are exact, they don't refer to the reality.
Imagination is more important than knowledge."
Albert Einstein
|
Other than in the posts in this thread, together with any links to other webpages in those posts, where is the speculative ATM idea that is the topic of this thread explained? In your answer, please focus on freely available sources.